Getting and Doing: Two Orientations Toward Life


Getting and Doing: Two Orientations Toward Life

In observing people, it becomes clear that there are two dominant orientations: those who prioritize getting and those who prioritize doing. At first glance, the distinction may seem subtle, but the difference in outlook, energy, and impact on others is profound.

Those who prioritize getting are motivated primarily by what they can receive from others. Their attention rests on acquisition — whether it be money, recognition, favors, or influence. They measure life in terms of accumulation, asking, often unconsciously, What can this person give me? What can I gain from this situation? This orientation creates an energy that is heavy, self-centered, and sometimes draining for those around them. The flow of their relationships is tilted inward, like gravity pulling everything toward their own needs.

In contrast, those who prioritize doing focus more on action, contribution, and process. Their measure of life is not what they can get, but what they can create, offer, or build. They ask instead, What can I do? How can I help? How can my presence make a difference? Their energy radiates outward — lighter, more generous, and expansive. It is less about possession and more about participation. They tend to leave others with a sense of possibility rather than depletion.

The two orientations are not merely differences in personality; they reflect contrasting philosophies of existence. A life of getting narrows the world to a marketplace of transactions, while a life of doing opens the world to a network of relationships and shared meaning. Getting isolates; doing connects. Getting consumes; doing generates.

Ultimately, both getting and doing are part of the human experience, but the balance matters. A society that celebrates only acquisition risks breeding scarcity and competition. A society that honors doing — the act of creating, serving, and giving — cultivates abundance and reciprocity. One orientation feeds on others; the other feeds others.

The choice of where to direct one’s energy becomes, in the end, a choice about the kind of life one wishes to live — one that clutches or one that contributes.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From Harlem to Dakar to St. Louis: The WikiExplorers go to the St Louis Jazz Festival

Image
WikiExplorers go to Senegal, a children’s story for ages 10–12, to learn about their shared history in music.  From Harlem to Dakar to St. Louis: The WikiExplorers Travel to Senegal   Ten WikiExplorers sat in a circle on the classroom floor in Harlem, laptops open, backpacks half-zipped, and ready to fly across the Atlantic Ocean to Dakar, Senegal.  “Dakar is right here,” said Amina, pointing at the map on her screen. “And St. Louis is way up north,” Malik added. “It used to be the capital of Senegal!” They were traveling to Senegal to attend a jazz festival in St. Louis, a city known for its music, rivers, and beautiful old buildings. Their assignment was special: learn about the shared history of African and African American music, find knowledge gaps on Wikipedia, and help fill them—with words, photos, and interviews. None of the children had ever been to Africa before. But Africa didn’t feel far away. Research Before the Journey Before the trip, the WikiExplorers met ...
Read more

The WikiExplorers and the Brilliant Mind of David Blackwell

Image
An educational children’s story designed for ages 9–12 about a group of curious kids called the WikiExplorers , who take on a Wikipedia research assignment and discover the story of David Blackwell and his surprising connection to AI and NVIDIA . The WikiExplorers and the Brilliant Mind of David Blackwell Written for Young Readers | Ages 9–12 Once a week, in a quiet corner of the school library, a special group of kids gathered. They called themselves the WikiExplorers—because their mission was to explore, discover, and share knowledge with the world by editing real Wikipedia articles. The club had five members: Zora, the thoughtful writer Miles, the math genius Kai, the tech whiz Luna, the fact-checker Tariq, the big-picture thinker One Friday afternoon, their club advisor, Ms. Ocampo, arrived with a special assignment. “Today, WikiExplorers,” she said, placing a stack of printouts on the table, “you’re going to add new information to a Wikipedia article—about NVIDIA, the computer c...
Read more

What's missing in New York City’s current political conversation.

What's  missing in New York City’s current political conversation and race for mayor While much of the world — from Singapore, South Korea, and Finland to parts of Africa and the Middle East — is pivoting toward innovation-driven economies, many of New York’s current political candidates (including Zohran Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo, and Curtis Sliwa) are speaking in reactive, not visionary, economic terms. New York City Needs an Innovation Vision The Global Shift Across the globe, cities and nations are redefining what drives their economies. They’re no longer relying on industrial output or traditional services but are building innovation-driven economies — ecosystems that combine research, technology, creativity, and entrepreneurship to generate new industries and sustainable prosperity. Singapore has invested in innovation districts and research hubs linking academia with industry. Finland transformed its post-industrial economy through design, technology, and education. China and In...
Read more